On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 05:19:24PM -0700, Rick H Wesson wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> this will only encourage the creation of A records in each gTLD for
> folks that automaticly create NS records children NS of a given zone in a
> TLD.
Rick, I think you are mixing two levels -- the protocol specification
level, and the registry policy level. A registry may indeed have a
policy that prevents multiple names for a nameserver IP address -- it
may implement that check, and a number of others in its database, and those
policies may be good things. But the question is whether they should
be specified in the protocol.
[...]
> I would also propose that a gRRP have a notification mechanism to prevent
> someone from using and IP address of an NS that I own. I would like to
> prevent folks from using my NS w/o permission.
It might be reasonable for the RRP to have a notification mechanism that
goes to the end user (though at this point it doesn't make sense to me
to have such a thing -- seems to break the "RR" part of "RRP"), but it
should be a general mechanism, and not tied to this specific policy
issue.
-- Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be kent@songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain --------- See http://www.nsiregistry.com/maillist/rrp/ for message archives and subscription management information.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 03 2000 - 13:38:49 EDT