Re: [NSI-RRP] Prohibiting Transfer

From: Eric Schaetzlein (eric@schlund.de)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 15:48:56 EDT

  • Next message: Hollenbeck, Scott: "RE: [NSI-RRP] Prohibiting Transfer"

    Hi Scott,

    I think you can do both things in both ways -

    a) blocking fraudulent transfers of V.I.P. domains with auto-NACKs or LOCKs
    b) delay/block legitimate transfers with auto-NACKS or LOCKs

    But clearly LOCKs are handled at the registry level and therefore are a stronger means
    for a) as well as b)

    So the question would be: let the registrars do the work or the registry?

    Eric

    On 2000/09/06, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
    > There's been a recent discussion among some of the NSI Registry's registrar
    > customers about using a domain status indicator to block domain transfer
    > requests. Does anyone here feel strongly one way or another about the idea
    > of having a status indicator that means that everything is OK with the
    > domain, but transfer requests will be automatically rejected?
    >
    > Some registrars claim that such a feature will help "lock down" a domain
    > from fraudulent transfer requests. On the other hand, others claim that it
    > could be used to delay or block legitimate transfer requests. Should there
    > be a GRRP requirement to provide a feature that will automatically reject
    > transfers?
    >
    > Scott Hollenbeck
    > Network Solutions, Inc. Registry
    > ---------
    > See http://www.nsiregistry.com/maillist/rrp/
    > for message archives and subscription management information.

    Mit freundlichen Gruessen

    Eric Schaetzlein 

    --
Eric Schaetzlein		Schlund + Partner AG	Tel:  +49 721 91374 50
Leiter Domain Services		Erbprinzenstr. 4-12	Fax:  +49 721 91374 20
				D-76133 Karlsruhe	Mail:  eric@schlund.de

    ---------
See http://www.nsiregistry.com/maillist/rrp/
for message archives and subscription management information.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 06 2000 - 15:58:19 EDT