RE: [NSI-RRP] 60 day transfer error

From: Hollenbeck, Scott (shollenb@netsol.com)
Date: Mon Sep 11 2000 - 13:47:43 EDT

  • Next message: Eric Schaetzlein: "Re: [NSI-RRP] 60 day transfer error"

    Eric,

    When ICANN asked us to enforce the 60-day no transfer rule at the Registry
    level, we didn't (and still don't) have an RRP response code that 100%
    mapped to this particular situation. We can't really change the RFC easily,
    so in the near term we had to overload this particular error code. I
    understand that the documentation doesn't address using this error code in
    this situation, but it seems like the most reasonable compromise at the
    time. We're looking at adding appropriate features to make this more
    obvious.

    Scott Hollenbeck
    VeriSign Global Registry Services

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Eric Schaetzlein [mailto:eric@schlund.de]
    Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 9:41 AM
    To: rrp@nsiregistry.net
    Subject: [NSI-RRP] 60 day transfer error

    Hi to all,

    is there a way to tell that a registrar transfer has been rejected only(!)
    because
    of the initial 60 day period?

    RRP currently returns
            552 Domain status does not allow for operation
    but the rfc says:
       The status of the domain does not allow the requested operation. This
       occurs when a registrar tries to modify or delete a domain that is
       flagged as LOCK or HOLD in the registry.

    The creation date isn't available via RRP because of 531 Authorization
    failed.
    (And registrar's whois can not automatically be parsed)

    Any help would be appreciated

    Best

    Eric Schaetzlein

    --
    Eric Schaetzlein		Schlund + Partner AG	Tel:  +49 721 91374
    50
    Leiter Domain Services		Erbprinzenstr. 4-12	Fax:  +49 721 91374
    20
    				D-76133 Karlsruhe	Mail:
    eric@schlund.de
    ---------
    See http://www.nsiregistry.com/maillist/rrp/
    for message archives and subscription management information.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 11 2000 - 13:56:34 EDT