Scott,
I would like to keep the agenda stricly to RRP there are enough things to
dicsuss with out geting whois mixed into it.
I'm one of several whois draft authors that would like to see a seporate
BOF for the whois extenions.
-rick
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> I have requested and received approval to hold a BOF at the San Diego IETF
> meeting to discuss the possibilities for a domain registration services
> working group. Here's what I asked the IESG to approve:
>
> BOF Description:
> Discussion of existing requirements for a generic registry-registrar
> protocol and check of interest in using these requirements as the basis for
> a standards track protocol. Review of current whois protocol proposals and
> check of interest in including whois protocols within the charter of a
> working group.
>
> Suggested Agenda:
> 5m Introductions and agenda presentation
> 20m Review of existing requirements per draft-hollenbeck-grrp-reqs-05.txt
> 15m Discussion of interest in a standards track domain registration protocol
> 15m Review of existing whois protocol efforts
> 15m Discussion of interest in whois protocols
> 20m Open discussion -- do we go on?
> 30m WG goal brainstorming
>
> This BOF will be hosted by the APPS area (Patrik Fältström), and have
> technical advisors from OPS (Randy Bush). I'll provide more details, such
> as schedule information, as it becomes available.
>
> Scott Hollenbeck
> VeriSign Global Registry Services
> ---------
> See http://www.verisign-grs.net/maillist/rrp/
> for message archives and subscription management information.
>
---------
See http://www.verisign-grs.net/maillist/rrp/
for message archives and subscription management information.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2000 - 13:35:13 EST