From a DNS point of view, I would recommend against it. It is permitted by
the DNS protocol, but putting host-like data (e.g., an A record) at a zone
apex (= "a domain") can run into interesting operational considerations.
(Especially when DNSSEC is included in the mix.)
At 12:02 PM -0500 3/28/01, Jim Archer wrote:
>Is it legal to have a name server that has the same name as a domain? For
>example, I know that there is a domain called macross.com in the system and
>also a name server called macross.com. I believe that was legal at one
>time, but I don't know if it still is.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis NAI Labs
Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com
Dilbert is an optimist.
Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.
---------
See http://www.verisign-grs.net/maillist/rrp/
for message archives and subscription management information.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 29 2001 - 14:59:52 EST